2021
DOI: 10.5935/1806-6690.20210066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing quality parameters obtained using destructive and optical methods in grading tomatoes

Abstract: Optical methods for analysing fruit quality have various advantages compared to conventional methods, including not destroying the sample and the possibility of automating the quality control process. The aim of this study was to compare artifi cial neural networks developed from biological activity indices obtained using the biospeckle laser optical technique, and from physico-chemical variables obtained by conventional destructive techniques, through an evaluation of their precision in classifying ripe tomat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the selection intensity [63,86,87], percentage of genetic progress [5,65,88] and the effectiveness of secondary traits [66,67,89] genetic approaches were applied to enhance the precision of identifying optimal predictor in segregating tomato populations. Previous researches consistently underscored the effective shared ability of such genetic methodologies to compare secondary traits, particularly in F2 populations [6,14,90,91].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the selection intensity [63,86,87], percentage of genetic progress [5,65,88] and the effectiveness of secondary traits [66,67,89] genetic approaches were applied to enhance the precision of identifying optimal predictor in segregating tomato populations. Previous researches consistently underscored the effective shared ability of such genetic methodologies to compare secondary traits, particularly in F2 populations [6,14,90,91].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%