2013
DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. What do the evidence show?

Abstract: The main purpose of the off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is to reduce morbidity and mortality due cardiopulmonary bypass. However, even though many studies have shown that off-pump coronary artery bypass is feasible and provides hospital morbidity and mortality similar to the on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, probably better in some aspects, its long-term results have been questioned, since some trials have shown reduced survival with off-pump coronary artery bypass. It is likely that incomp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the continuous evolution, CPB has potential harm as a result of physiological processes and can result in tissue damage and organ dysfunction. As the interest for OPCABG has been gradually increasing, several concerns have been raised and authors are still trying to answer if OPCABG reduces hospital morbidity and mortality, if OPCABG has the same outcomes especially regarding security, long-term survival and quality of grafts and if it is possible to perform the full revascularization using OPCABG [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the continuous evolution, CPB has potential harm as a result of physiological processes and can result in tissue damage and organ dysfunction. As the interest for OPCABG has been gradually increasing, several concerns have been raised and authors are still trying to answer if OPCABG reduces hospital morbidity and mortality, if OPCABG has the same outcomes especially regarding security, long-term survival and quality of grafts and if it is possible to perform the full revascularization using OPCABG [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies show different conclusions regarding the results found when the techniques compared with and without cardiopulmonary bypass [ 21 , 23 ] . On the other hand, several investigators have indicated that off-pump CABG surgery may increase the risk of thrombosis due to augmented thrombotic activity [ 24 , 25 ] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The literature is rich in studies comparing OPCAB versus on-pump CABG with controversial results, showing either improved outcomes or no significant difference between the two procedures. 9 10 11 12 13 These results have led surgeons to appraise whether or not off-pump surgery may be specifically beneficial for high-risk patient groups. 11 14 15 However, few studies directly compare the two techniques in PAD patients undergoing CABG, some of which are biased by imbalances in patient characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%