2013
DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and ultramicroscopic myocardial randomized study of beating versus arrested heart for mitral surgery

Abstract: 270Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc | Braz J Cardiovasc SurgRev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2013;28(2):270-80 Cueva CNC, et al. -Clinical and ultramicroscopic myocardial randomized study of beating versus arrested heart for mitral surgery RBCCV 44205-1467 DOI: 10.5935/1678 Clinical and ultramicroscopic myocardial randomized study of beating versus arrested heart for mitral surgery Objectives: This study compared clinical and transmission electron microscopic aspects of myocardial protection during mitral valve replacement u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be explained by the increased ischemic burden exerted by on-pump beating CABG which therefore derive in diastolic dysfunction and pulmonary edema. Previous data has shown similar ultrastructural abnormalities in patients who underwent beating and arrested heart procedures [ 17 ] . Nonetheless, even though logistic regression aims at correcting baseline differences, patients with AXC were less sicker and this could contribute to our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This could be explained by the increased ischemic burden exerted by on-pump beating CABG which therefore derive in diastolic dysfunction and pulmonary edema. Previous data has shown similar ultrastructural abnormalities in patients who underwent beating and arrested heart procedures [ 17 ] . Nonetheless, even though logistic regression aims at correcting baseline differences, patients with AXC were less sicker and this could contribute to our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%