Behavioral Pain Scale and Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for pain evaluation
            in orotracheally tubed critical patients. A systematic review of the literature

Pinheiro, Ana Rita Pais de Queiróz; Marques, Rita

doi:10.5935/0103-507x.20190070

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, more than half (61.5%) of the participants were medically classified as non-traumatic patients. Regarding consciousness level for the patients according to GCS was (5)(6)(7)(8), representing more than half (58.5%) of the study subjects. Finally, narcotics was approximately used by about two-fifths (42.2%) of study subject.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…3,4 Careful pain assessment contributes to effective pain management by increasing the sufficiency of therapeutic measures such as analgesics and sedation use, as well as decreasing patient stays in the ICU. 5 Approximately 75% of ICU hospitalized patients have severe pain. About 50% of them are having pain during invasive nursing procedures and about 30% are having pain even at rest.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Determination of procedural pain intensity among Critically-Ill patients: Using Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS)

Bachi

AL-Fayyadh

2022

J. Contemp. Med. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To assess pain severity for routine nursing procedures. As well as to compare pain severity during three measurement phases. And to find out the differences among routine nursing procedures pain severity. Methods: An observational method for data collection and sample of 135 subjects who had met the study's inclusion criteria were targeted. The data collection started from January 18thto April 7th, 2022. Results: Patients were silently suffering pain during all three assessment phases: pre-during, and 20 minutes’ post-routine nursing procedures. Of equal importance, there is a statistically significant difference between all nursing procedures in terms of pain intensity. Conclusion: The critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients who were recruited in this study, were silently suffering from a relatively high level of pain during their hospitalization period in the Intensive Care Unit. The highlighted case of silent suffering is a serious gap in both medical and nursing care quality that must be addressed both urgently and effectively.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of procedural pain intensity among Critically-Ill patients: Using Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS)

Bachi

AL-Fayyadh

2022

J. Contemp. Med. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Brazilian version of the BPS showed good agreement between raters (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.80 and 0.97) and good criterion validity with self-reported pain scores. Discriminative validity led to variable findings across studies, including significant increases during both nociceptive and non-nociceptive procedures [ 25 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation Testing of the European Portuguese Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool

Marques¹,

Araújo

Férnandes

et al. 2022

Healthcare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim. The study aim was to validate the Portuguese version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) in the critically ill adult population of Portugal. Methods. A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate the CPOT in mechanically ventilated patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit. A consecutive sample of 110 patients was observed at rest pre-procedure, during a nociceptive procedure (NP) which includes turning/positioning and endotracheal or tracheal suctioning and 20 min post-procedure. Two raters participated in the data collection. The discriminative validity, criterion validity, convergent validity and inter-rater reliability of the CPOT were examined. Results. The inter-rater reliability was excellent (0.93 ≤ α ≤ 1.00) at rest and fair to moderate (0.39 ≤ α ≤ 0.60) during the NP. The CPOT could discriminate between conditions with higher scores during the NP when compared to CPOT scores at rest (p < 0.001). The optimal CPOT cut-off score was >2, with a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 80%, and self-reported pain was the gold standard criterion. Significant correlations (<0.40) were found between CPOT scores, the heart rate and the respiratory rate during the nociceptive procedure. Conclusions. The CPOT appears to be a valid alternative for both ventilated and non-ventilated patients who are unable to communicate.

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, pain is common in critically ill patients, despite of their condition, precise assessment using suitable equipment allows for the use of more useful therapeutic measures. (Pinheiro, et al, 2019) Physiological reaction to pain may lead to harmful effects on the convalescence of the body after cardiac catheterization. Pain occurred after cardiac catheterization caused by tissue retraction and dissection, multiple intravascular cannulations and invasive procedures that patients undergo as part of their therapeutic regimen.…”

Section: (Hilário Et Al 2017)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Rhythmic Breathing Technique on Pain Level among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization

Malk

Amr²,

Shrief³

2022

Egyptian Journal of Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Pain is common in critically ill patients, inadequate pain relief post cardiac catheterization delays recovery and lead to increased workload of heart and increased hospital stays. Rhythmic breathing is simple, low cost, non-invasive technique and effective in reducing the pain severity. Aim of this study is conducted to examine the effect of rhythmic breathing technique on the pain intensity of patient after cardiac catheter. Design: A quasi-experimental design was used.

show abstract

Behavioral Pain Scale and Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for pain evaluation in orotracheally tubed critical patients. A systematic review of the literature

Cited by 10 publications

References 20 publications

Determination of procedural pain intensity among Critically-Ill patients: Using Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS)

Determination of procedural pain intensity among Critically-Ill patients: Using Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS)

Validation Testing of the European Portuguese Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool

Effect of Rhythmic Breathing Technique on Pain Level among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About