2015
DOI: 10.5935/0103-5053.20150227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Monolithic and Core-Shell Columns for Separation of Triazine Herbicides by Reversed Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The porous shell and small solid core can afford a higher surface area for the separation to occur while the solid core plus the porous shell gives a larger particle and thus low operating back pressure [ 5 ]. Studies comparing the conventional totally porous particles and core–shell particles have been done to determine different drug groups [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. There are few studies on the application of core–shell silica materials in chiral chromatography [ 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porous shell and small solid core can afford a higher surface area for the separation to occur while the solid core plus the porous shell gives a larger particle and thus low operating back pressure [ 5 ]. Studies comparing the conventional totally porous particles and core–shell particles have been done to determine different drug groups [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. There are few studies on the application of core–shell silica materials in chiral chromatography [ 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literatures described comparisons between core–shell particles and the conventional totally porous particles . Other comparisons were made in practical application for determination of different drug groups .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%