2015
DOI: 10.5935/0103-5053.20150161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruthenium(II) Complexes Containing Anti-Inflammatory Drugs as Ligands: Synthesis, Characterization andin vitroCytotoxicity Activities on Cancer Cell Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…) 62. The 13 C NMR spectra of these complexes show singlets at 190.3 and 189.5 ppm for Ru 1 and Ru 2 , respectively, attributed to the chelating bidentate carboxylates, which are consistent with chemical shifts reported in the literature for Ru complexes bearing chelating bidentate acetate ligands 63.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…) 62. The 13 C NMR spectra of these complexes show singlets at 190.3 and 189.5 ppm for Ru 1 and Ru 2 , respectively, attributed to the chelating bidentate carboxylates, which are consistent with chemical shifts reported in the literature for Ru complexes bearing chelating bidentate acetate ligands 63.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, several studies suggest that COX-2 inhibitors such as NSAIDs might not only play a role in the treatment of breast cancer, but also in its prevention [80]. For instance, the in vitro cytotoxicity of two cationic ruthenium(II) dppm (diphenylphosphinomethane) complexes (12), respectively bearing diclofenac (Ru-Dicl) and ibuprofen (Ru-Ibp) ( Figure 3) in MCF7 breast cancer cells, was reported by Von Poelhsitz et al (2015) and compared with that of a ruthenium complex control (with no bioactive ligand), cis-[RuCl 2 (dppm) 2 ], and cisplatin [81]. Both ruthenium complexes displayed a higher cytotoxicity (IC 50 = 47 ± 6 ”M for Ru-Dicl, MCF7; IC 50 = 9 ± 3 ”M for Ru-Ibp, MCF7) than that of the ruthenium complex control (IC 50 = 191 ± 13 ”M, MCF7), highlighting the importance of the NSAID ligand on the anticancer activity of the compounds.…”
Section: Other Ruthenium Complexes For the Treatment Of Hormone Recepmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Both ruthenium complexes displayed a higher cytotoxicity (IC 50 = 47 ± 6 ”M for Ru-Dicl, MCF7; IC 50 = 9 ± 3 ”M for Ru-Ibp, MCF7) than that of the ruthenium complex control (IC 50 = 191 ± 13 ”M, MCF7), highlighting the importance of the NSAID ligand on the anticancer activity of the compounds. Moreover, the IC 50 value of Ru-Ibp was found to be significantly lower than that of cisplatin (IC 50 = 34 ± 4 ”M, MCF7) [81]. It is worth mentioning that the potential COX inhibition activity of the compounds discussed above was not studied.…”
Section: Other Ruthenium Complexes For the Treatment Of Hormone Recepmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is widely known that phenolic acids and flavonoids, such as caffeic acid derived from hydroxycinnamic acids found in the soybean meal aqueous extract display antitumoral activity [30]. Cell viability decreases could be caused by the structural and functional damages in the assessed cell lineage [46]. Additional studies are required to determine what types of and the extension of the damage that the soybean meal aqueous extract caused to tumoral and healthy mouse BM and L929 cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%