2014
DOI: 10.5935/0103-5053.20140186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Drop Microextraction: a Sensitive Multiresidue Method for Determination of Pesticides in Water Using GC/ECD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analyte extraction was not significantly affected by the type of extraction solvent (n-hexane or toluene) (Soares et al 2014). n-Hexane was suitable for the extraction of OCPs and pyrethroids from drinking water (Carlos et al 2013), multiclass pesticides from water and soil (Soares et al 2014;Soares et al 2015). For the extraction of the atrazine, desethyl-atrazine, desisopropyl-atrazine from the water samples, toluene, n-hexane, and cyclohexane were investigated, however, due to their low viscosity and density, the microdrop was not stable.…”
Section: Environmental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The analyte extraction was not significantly affected by the type of extraction solvent (n-hexane or toluene) (Soares et al 2014). n-Hexane was suitable for the extraction of OCPs and pyrethroids from drinking water (Carlos et al 2013), multiclass pesticides from water and soil (Soares et al 2014;Soares et al 2015). For the extraction of the atrazine, desethyl-atrazine, desisopropyl-atrazine from the water samples, toluene, n-hexane, and cyclohexane were investigated, however, due to their low viscosity and density, the microdrop was not stable.…”
Section: Environmental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overview of the applicability of SDME for environmental sample analysis is shown in the Table 2. SDME was an appropriate extraction technique for liquid samples such as tap water (Kaykhaii et al 2005;Lamboropoulou et al 2007;Yohannes et al 2016), river water (Kaykhaii et al 2005;Saraji and Bankhshi 2005;Ahmadi et al 2006;De Souza Pinheiro et al 2009;De Souza Pinheiro et al 2011;Soares et al 2014;Amde et al 2015;Yohannes et al 2016), lake water (Wu et al 2008;Xie et al 2014;Amde et al 2015;Yohannes et al 2016), surface water (Lopez-Blanco et al 2003;Lamboropoulou et al 2007;Santos et al 2017), drinking water (Lopez-Blanco et al 2003;Ahmadi et al 2006;Carlos et al 2013), effluent and influent water (Amde et al 2015), ground water (Yohannes et al 2016;Santos et al 2017), water from the farm (Ahmadi et al 2006), sea water (Tian et al 2014) and other water samples (Przyjazny and Kokosa 2002). Furthermore, SDME was applied for the extraction of the pesticides from the soil samples (Salemi et al 2013;Williams et al 2014;Soares et al 2015).…”
Section: Environmental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eclética Química Journal, 43, special number, 2018, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] ISSN: 1678-4618 DOI: 10.26850/1678-4618eqj.v43.1SI.2018.p11-21 organoleptic, physical and chemical characteristics 7 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in the literature reported the determination of pesticide residues in water using the techniques of sample preparation solidphase extraction -SPE 11 ; solid-phase microextraction -SPME 1,12 ; liquid-liquid extraction with low temperature partitioning -LLE-LTP 13,14 ; liquid phase microextraction -LPME 15,16 ; dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction -DLLME 17,18 ; single drop microextraction -SDME 19 . Despite the high number of existing techniques, the salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction (SALLE) technique emerged as a new alternative for the extraction of pesticide residues in water based on its advantages of simplicity of operation, rapidity (brief time for phase separation), low volume of both sample and solvent, low cost, safety and good sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%