2013
DOI: 10.5935/0103-5053.20130262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Validation Criterion for Guiding the Selection of Variables by the Successive Projections Algorithm in Classification Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the number of samples is small and does not favor the construction of a validation set, SPA–LDA was used with internal validation (the training set was used to select the lowest risk of incorrect classification). 42,43 In order to avoid overfitting in the classification models, the maximum number of variables (N) equal to eight (number of samples from the lowest Training class minus the number of classes for modeling) was selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the number of samples is small and does not favor the construction of a validation set, SPA–LDA was used with internal validation (the training set was used to select the lowest risk of incorrect classification). 42,43 In order to avoid overfitting in the classification models, the maximum number of variables (N) equal to eight (number of samples from the lowest Training class minus the number of classes for modeling) was selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SPA has two disadvantages: (1) If the sample size of the calibration set is small, the samples for modeling are unrepresentative. Although the variable collinearity of the calibration set is minimized, on the validation set, an inappropriate selection of variables could mean that the prediction results are not satisfactory [ 22 , 23 , 24 ]. (2) SPA is an unsupervised variable selection method, therefore, the selected variables do not necessarily reflect the information of the measured component well [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%