2013
DOI: 10.5935/0103-5053.20130081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Fuel Origin by Comprehensive 2D GC-FID and Parallel Factor Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) is widely used as a primary method for characterization of fuels. Typical analyses performed usually involve the identification of certain compounds [2][3][4][5] , the use of ratios between chemicals [6,7,8] and identification and quantification of markers or additives [9][10][11][12]. Many previous studies successfully used GC-MS to determine the individual component composition and fuel additives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) is widely used as a primary method for characterization of fuels. Typical analyses performed usually involve the identification of certain compounds [2][3][4][5] , the use of ratios between chemicals [6,7,8] and identification and quantification of markers or additives [9][10][11][12]. Many previous studies successfully used GC-MS to determine the individual component composition and fuel additives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, there has been a growing interest in fuel source identification and classification using gas chromatography and chemometric methods. It has been shown in the literature that GC×GC-FID and parallel factor analysis can be successfully utilized to differentiate the chromatogram patterns between petrol (Type A) samples from Venezuela and Brazil [7]. Twentyfive diesel samples from 13 different US diesel brands were classified using GC-MS total ion chromatogram (TIC) and extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) data evaluated by Pearson product moment correlation (PPMC) and principal component analysis (PCA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to conventional gas chromatography (1D-GC), GC × GC provides increased peak capacity to resolve sample components from complex matrices. For example, the separation of complex petrochemicals can be improved by applying combinations of various polydimethyl(siloxane) (PDMS) and poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG) derived stationary phases (i.e., DB-1 × BPX-50, DB-1 × DB-1701, and Solgel Wax × BPX-50 column sets) [6][7][8][9]. An essential requirement for maximizing peak capacity in GC × GC is to employ a combination of stationary phases possessing complementary selectivities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be observed inFigure 2Dthat IL 1 exhibited significantly higher chromatographic efficiency compared to R2. Moreover, compared to R1, which possesses a shorter alkyl side chain substituent, IL 1 also exhibited a significant enhancement in the selectivity of nonpolar analytes, as observed inFigure 2D.To further evaluate the resolving power of the lipidic IL-based stationary phase toward aliphatic hydrocarbons, the separation result for 1 was also compared with a PEG-based column (SUPELCOWAX 10) commonly employed as a second dimension column for the separation of nonpolar aliphatic hydrocarbons by GC × GC[7][8][9]. As shown inFigures 3A and 3B, a wider distribution of the analytes within the separation window was observed when employing the Rtx-5 × 1 column set.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%