Medicine based on evidences

Reducing the GAP between science and clinic: lessons from academia and professional practice - part A: perceptual-auditory judgment of vocal quality, acoustic vocal signal analysis and voice self-assessment

“…As a consequence, the evidence described in the literature was often not applicable to practice, which distanced research and clinic. On the other hand, clinical practice was based on what was learned at graduation, and when faced with uncertainty, doubts were directed to specialist colleagues or references in the area (7) . Over time, scientific evidence has become increasingly easier for clinicians to access, with research papers made available by open access science journals, courses, congresses, books, scientific content lives, among others.…”

“…Over time, scientific evidence has become increasingly easier for clinicians to access, with research papers made available by open access science journals, courses, congresses, books, scientific content lives, among others. Given the large volume of information available, the challenge that once was to be able to access it, became to be able to find good quality evidence with clinical applicability (7,8) .…”

“…To reduce the GAP between science and practice, in the 1990s a movement called Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) emerged. EBP consists of associating the patient's perspectives and clinical experience, with the ability to consciously and judiciously analyze and apply the best scientific evidence available (7)(8)(9) (Figure 1). This movement induced developing researches to gather evidences that could answer some of the doubts faced in practice.…”

Reduzindo o GAP entre a ciência e a clínica: lições da academia e da prática profissional – parte A: julgamento perceptivo-auditivo da qualidade vocal, análise acústica do sinal vocal e autoavaliação em voz

“…Dessa forma, as evidências descritas nas pesquisas científicas muitas vezes não eram aplicáveis à prática, o que distanciava a pesquisa e a clínica. Por outro lado, a prática clínica era baseada em um aprendizado adquirido na graduação, e quando havia dúvida, recorria-se aos colegas especialistas ou referências na área (7) . Com o passar do tempo, as evidências científicas passaram a ser cada vez de mais fácil acesso para os clínicos, com pesquisas disponíveis em periódicos de acesso aberto, cursos, congressos, livros, lives de conteúdo científico, entre outros.…”

“…Com o passar do tempo, as evidências científicas passaram a ser cada vez de mais fácil acesso para os clínicos, com pesquisas disponíveis em periódicos de acesso aberto, cursos, congressos, livros, lives de conteúdo científico, entre outros. Diante do grande volume de informações disponíveis, o desafio que antes era o acesso, passa a ser a seleção da evidência de melhor qualidade e aplicabilidade clínica (7,8) .…”