2020
DOI: 10.5935/0034-7140.20200015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signaling honesty: Institutional strength and voters' concern about corruption in a model of electoral competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model demonstrates that an abundance of local government resources is a curse, encourages clientelism and does not improve the provision of local public policy. Such a situation cannot be fully understood when using neo-institutional theoretical frameworks (Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012; Griebeler and Silva, 2020). Latin America offers counter-examples to such logic, which in turn reinforce the logic of our model: harder sentences make more expensive every vote, while increased public finance means a higher expected revenue and cost of winning the elections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model demonstrates that an abundance of local government resources is a curse, encourages clientelism and does not improve the provision of local public policy. Such a situation cannot be fully understood when using neo-institutional theoretical frameworks (Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012; Griebeler and Silva, 2020). Latin America offers counter-examples to such logic, which in turn reinforce the logic of our model: harder sentences make more expensive every vote, while increased public finance means a higher expected revenue and cost of winning the elections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%