2017
DOI: 10.5935/0034-7140.20170017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Casamentos Seletivos e Desigualdade de Renda no Brasil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The counterfactual scenario arising from random re-matching suggests a Gini coefficient between 2 and 4 points lower than that observed for 2018. This result is slightly higher than that reported for the United States (Eika et al, 2019;Greenwood et al, 2014;Hryshko et al, 2017), although it is in the intermediate range of that reported for developing countries (Leal, 2015;Pereira & Santos, 2017). The above suggests that assortative mating may operate more strongly in developing countries.…”
Section: Incompletecontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The counterfactual scenario arising from random re-matching suggests a Gini coefficient between 2 and 4 points lower than that observed for 2018. This result is slightly higher than that reported for the United States (Eika et al, 2019;Greenwood et al, 2014;Hryshko et al, 2017), although it is in the intermediate range of that reported for developing countries (Leal, 2015;Pereira & Santos, 2017). The above suggests that assortative mating may operate more strongly in developing countries.…”
Section: Incompletecontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Similar conclusions were obtained by Boertien and Permanyer (2019) when considering a group of 21 European countries. Pereira and Santos (2017) reported a 3-point reduction in Brazil's Gini coefficient (0.57 vs. 0.54) in 2010, after randomly re-matching observations in one of the few precedents for developing countries. The authors highlighted that educational assortative mating has increased between 1970-2010 in that country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, we counted half of all individuals who filed a tax return in this bracket, besides all who filed the bracket above BR$ 1,000,000.9 The scenario is even more serious when we consider that assortative mating has increased in Brazil over the past few decades. According toPereira and Santos (2017), for example, between 1970 and 2010 Brazilians increasingly married partners who have similar socioeconomic characteristics. Using counterfactual simulations, the authors pointed out that although income inequality improved in Brazil during this period, the Brazilian income distribution would have improved even more had this tendency for assortative mating not happened.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%