Crime and punishment in classroom: a game-theoretic approach for student cheating

Griebeler, Marcelo de Carvalho

doi:10.5935/0034-7140.20170003

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

(20 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These results were similar to my own research and model, the more effort the management/professor puts into looking for cheaters, the less incentive there would be for athletes/students to cheat. (Griebeler 2017) The research paper "The Performance-Enhancing Drug Game Reconsidered" looked at how incorporating fair play norms into the model would change the results dramatically. In their game model, by adding these norms, it changed the model from a prisoner's dilemma to a stag hunt game.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Redemption for Olympic Weightlifting: Is a Doping-Free Future Possible?

Liu¹

2020

PAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is to find if a doping-free equilibrium is possible in the sport of Olympic Weightlifting. A thorough literature review was conducted as well as a 3 player model (Athletes, Management, Customers) similar to the basic inspection game. It was found that with the new payoffs introduced after the McLaren report, where high level corruption was uncovered and exposed, a doping-free N.E. (Nash Equilibrium) can be achieved. The principal factor was that customers must demand test results from the management of all athletes, and be supportive when dopers are caught. A complete contrast to the current system where the organizations completely control the information flow and decide when and if a negative was found. If this change wasn’t implemented, management would prefer to keep all the tests hidden to ensure that profits would continue to rise. However, this conclusion is the most pareto efficient result as athletes won’t have to use drugs that would harm their body for years to come. And customers can enjoy the continuous advancement of technique and training in Olympic Weightlifting.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Redemption for Olympic Weightlifting: Is a Doping-Free Future Possible?

Liu¹

2020

PAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…В то же время рост вероятности быть пойманным на обмане снижает вероятность читинга (Freiburger et al, 2016). Кроме того, важную роль в предотвращении читинга среди студентов могут играть стремление преподавателя обеспечить высокую степень «беспристрастности в классе» [fairness in classroom] и низкая «тягость» усилий по обеспечению этого (Griebeler, 2017). Данный результат получен на основании теоретико-игровой модели.…”

unclassified

Empirical Analysis of Opportunism Based on Data on University Students of Different Courses

Rozmainsky¹,

Shegay²

2021

JIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is devoted to the New Institutional analysis of the factors of opportunism among students of different courses. The analysis is based on a survey in which 231 students from the Higher School of Economics and other Russian universities took part from February to May 2021. Econometric modeling is based on Latent class analysis, which allows the identification of unobservable groups based on the observed categorical variables presented. One of the main findings of the research is that fourth year students are less prone to opportunism than first, second and third year students. This can be explained by the higher opportunity costs of cheating among fourth year students and their greater independence, primarily financial. In addition, students who are motivated primarily to obtain knowledge (mastery) show a lesser inclination towards opportunism compared with students whose main motive is the degree (performance). Furthermore, a higher level of rationality, both in a general sense and in relation to budget planning, is reflected in a greater tendency to dishonest behavior. Finally, more honest behavior outside the university is combined with more dishonest academic behavior. The latter can be explained by the fact that it is psychologically more difficult to commit an immoral act in relation to a loved one than to do so in an academic environment, when you deceive a not personally familiar person and not even a specific person. Thus, on the basis of the analysis carried out, it can be understood under what conditions the student environment will be characterized by a higher propensity for opportunism and, accordingly, a lower rate of human capital accumulation.

show abstract

A systemic model of academic (mis)conduct to curb cheating in higher education

Allen

Kizilcec

2023

High Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Crime and punishment in classroom: a game-theoretic approach for student cheating

Cited by 5 publications

References 13 publications

Redemption for Olympic Weightlifting: Is a Doping-Free Future Possible?

Redemption for Olympic Weightlifting: Is a Doping-Free Future Possible?

Empirical Analysis of Opportunism Based on Data on University Students of Different Courses

A systemic model of academic (mis)conduct to curb cheating in higher education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About