2022
DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20230051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of fitting HydroCone (Toris K) contact lenses for the visual rehabilitation of patients with posterior microphthalmos

Abstract: To evaluate the efficacy of soft HydroCone silicone hydrogel contact lenses in patients with posterior microphthalmos. Methods: The charts of 13 patients with posterior microphthalmos (26 eyes) who were fitted with soft HydroCone silicone hydrogel contact lenses were reviewed retrospectively. All the patients underwent assessments of uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and cycloplegic refraction. They were fitted with contact lenses according to the parameter values obtained from the topogra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17] Based on this, Karabulut and Özçelik reported that an effective visual rehabilitation was achieved by Toris K lenses in PMs with steep corneas. 30 In our series, our patients had satisfactory visual acuity and comfort with Toris K. Because there is no study in the literature comparing Toris K and RGPCLs in PMs, we investigated whether these two lenses have an advantage regarding visual rehabilitation and comfort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17] Based on this, Karabulut and Özçelik reported that an effective visual rehabilitation was achieved by Toris K lenses in PMs with steep corneas. 30 In our series, our patients had satisfactory visual acuity and comfort with Toris K. Because there is no study in the literature comparing Toris K and RGPCLs in PMs, we investigated whether these two lenses have an advantage regarding visual rehabilitation and comfort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%