Comparing the vision quality using double-pass technique in eyes with corrected refractive errors and emmetropic eyes

Henríquez, María A; Mosquera, Samuel-Arba; Camargo, Jorge; Izquierdo, Luis

doi:10.5935/0004-2749.20220050

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The size and shape of the reflected light source are analysed by the system for optical quality to determine the higher‐order aberrations and scattered light. The system is easy to use and is helpful in refractive surgery, to detect and classify cataract and evaluate the degradation of tear film over time 22,26 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The system is easy to use and is helpful in refractive surgery, to detect and classify cataract and evaluate the degradation of tear film over time. 22,26 Vision break-up time is the elapsed period from 0 s to the time at which the participant's vision quality index has dropped below a defined threshold. Essentially, it is the time needed for the point spread function to deteriorate, whereupon vision is predicted to be impacted.…”

Section: Hd Analyzermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Tear film dynamics of a new soft contact lens

Buch

Riederer

Scales

et al. 2023

Ophthalmic Physiologic Optic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeTo present the objective metrics from a study that evaluated the clinical performance of a senofilcon A contact lens, both with and without a new manufacturing technique.MethodsThis was a single‐site, five‐visit, controlled, randomised, subject‐masked, 2 × 2 crossover study (May–August 2021) with a 2‐week lens dispensing period (bilateral wear) and weekly follow‐up visits. Healthy adult (18–39 years), habitual spherical silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers were included. The High‐definition (HD) Analyzer™ was used to objectively measure the lens‐on‐eye optical system resulting from the study lenses at 1‐week follow‐up. Measurements assessed were vision break‐up time (VBUT), modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff, Strehl ratio (SR), potential visual acuity (PVA) for 100% contrast and objective scatter index (OSI).ResultsOf the 50 enrolled participants, 47 (94.0%) were randomly assigned to one of the two possible lens wear sequences (test/control or control/test) and dispensed at least one study lens. The estimated odds ratio of VBUT > 10 s was 1.582 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.009 to 2.482) in test versus control lens. The least squares mean difference estimates of MTF cutoff, SR and PVA for 100% contrast between test versus control lens were 2.243 (95% CI: 0.012 to 4.475), 0.011 (95% CI: −0.002 to 0.023) and 0.073 (95% CI: −0.001 to 0.147), respectively. The estimated ratio of median OSI between test versus control lens was 0.887 (95% CI: 0.727 to 1.081). The test lens demonstrated superiority over the control lens with respect to VBUT and MTF cutoff. No serious adverse events were reported; eight adverse events (three ocular, five non‐ocular) were indicated by six participants during the study.ConclusionThe test lens demonstrated an increased probability of having a longer VBUT (>10 s). Future studies may be designed to assess the efficacy and long‐term use of the test lens in a larger population.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Hd Analyzermentioning

confidence: 99%