2020
DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20200022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanics in DALK: Big bubble vs manual lamellar dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corneal hysteresis and resistance were similar in both groups, thus suggesting that manual lamellar dissection was not a disadvantage. 11 This suggests that manual delamination, as described in this study, can serve as a valid rescue for technical failures encountered during microkeratome preparations. Similarly, we have experienced corneal perforation in one graft due to deep manual delamination after the overestimation of thickness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Corneal hysteresis and resistance were similar in both groups, thus suggesting that manual lamellar dissection was not a disadvantage. 11 This suggests that manual delamination, as described in this study, can serve as a valid rescue for technical failures encountered during microkeratome preparations. Similarly, we have experienced corneal perforation in one graft due to deep manual delamination after the overestimation of thickness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…[ 7 ] Various studies had been reported henceforth comparing its outcome with other techniques of DALK. [ 16 18 19 20 ] Inferior visual outcome is reported in cases with residual posterior stromal tissue, especially in manual DALK. [ 16 18 19 20 ] Hence, BB DALK has become the preferred technique for DALK among experienced corneal surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 16 18 19 20 ] Inferior visual outcome is reported in cases with residual posterior stromal tissue, especially in manual DALK. [ 16 18 19 20 ] Hence, BB DALK has become the preferred technique for DALK among experienced corneal surgeons. In the current study as well, BB DALK was the most preferred technique, followed by manual and viscoelastic assisted DALK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the resulting data have a large scatter and can only be used to a limited extent with various theoretical constructions in the clinical prediction of the behavior of a particular eye. Now in clinical practice, devices such as Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert, Ophthalmic Instruments, USA) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and Corvis-ST (OCULUS, Optikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) have found application [8][9][10][11]. Both devices (and their analogues) use a calibrated air flow to deform the cornea in the central region, and then analyze the movement of the cornea under its influence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%