2013
DOI: 10.5581/1516-8484.20130092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The consequence of stacking by Brazilian journals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A relatively new secondary interest that can be attributed to the shortcomings of “the big science” era is the urge to improve prestige, productivity, and citation profiles of a journal. Editors, who take multiple decision-making posts in competing journals, push citations to “friendly” articles and create “citation stacking schemes,” are particularly exposing themselves to conflicts that undermine the validity of the editorial work ( 8 ). The urge to improve journal ranks also creates a series of hurdles for editors and publishers, who may be tempted to publish potentially citable papers circumventing rigorous peer review.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively new secondary interest that can be attributed to the shortcomings of “the big science” era is the urge to improve prestige, productivity, and citation profiles of a journal. Editors, who take multiple decision-making posts in competing journals, push citations to “friendly” articles and create “citation stacking schemes,” are particularly exposing themselves to conflicts that undermine the validity of the editorial work ( 8 ). The urge to improve journal ranks also creates a series of hurdles for editors and publishers, who may be tempted to publish potentially citable papers circumventing rigorous peer review.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%