2013
DOI: 10.5581/1516-8484.20130052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kidney dysfunction and beta S-haplotypes in patients with sickle cell disease

Abstract: ObjetiveTo investigate the association between kidney dysfunction and haplotypes in sickle cell disease. MethodsA cohort of 84 sickle cell disease patients, treated in a public health service in Fortaleza, Brazil, was studied. Hemoglobin S haplotypes were obtained from 57 patients as they had recently received blood transfusions with 18 of them agreeing to undertake urinary concentrating ability and acidification tests. The glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No association was found between albuminuria and beta S-globin haplotypes (CAR versus non-CAR haplotypes) ( 35 , 36 ) . An evaluation of the association between kidney dysfunction and haplotypes in 84 Brazilian sickle cell disease patients is published in this issue of the Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia (RBHH) ( 37 ) . GFR, urinary concentrating capacity and urinary acidification were determined and there was no significant difference when comparing patients with the CAR/CAR and BEN/BEN haplotypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No association was found between albuminuria and beta S-globin haplotypes (CAR versus non-CAR haplotypes) ( 35 , 36 ) . An evaluation of the association between kidney dysfunction and haplotypes in 84 Brazilian sickle cell disease patients is published in this issue of the Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia (RBHH) ( 37 ) . GFR, urinary concentrating capacity and urinary acidification were determined and there was no significant difference when comparing patients with the CAR/CAR and BEN/BEN haplotypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%