2011
DOI: 10.5581/1516-8484.20110099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brazilian workshop model to train investigators in chronic graft-versus-host disease clinical trials according to the 2005-2006 National Institutes of Health recommendations

Abstract: BackgroundThe lack of standardization of clinical diagnostic criteria, classification and severity scores of chronic graft-versus-host disease led the National Institutes of Health to propose consensus criteria for the purpose of clinical trials.MethodHere we describe a one-day workshop model conducted by the Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Brazil-Seattle Consortium Study Group to train investigators interested in participating in multicenter clinical trials in Brazil. Workshop participants included eight tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The article by Rita de Cássia Barbosa da Silva Tavares ( 1 ) describes the results of a training course for professionals interested in applying the 2005-2006 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus criteria to the scoring and response measurement of chronic graftversus-host disease (GvHD). Fifteen professionals and nine patients participated in the three and a half hour training session where clinicians were taught the consensus criteria and tried to apply them to actual patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article by Rita de Cássia Barbosa da Silva Tavares ( 1 ) describes the results of a training course for professionals interested in applying the 2005-2006 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus criteria to the scoring and response measurement of chronic graftversus-host disease (GvHD). Fifteen professionals and nine patients participated in the three and a half hour training session where clinicians were taught the consensus criteria and tried to apply them to actual patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%