2014
DOI: 10.5194/tc-8-1651-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healing of snow surface-to-surface contacts by isothermal sintering

Abstract: Abstract. Natural sintering in ice is a fundamental process determining mechanical properties of various ice forms. According to the literature, limited data are available about the complex subjects of snow sintering and bond formation. Here, through cold laboratory mechanical tests with a new shear apparatus we demonstrate time-dependent effects of isothermal sintering on interface strengthening at various normal pressures. Measurements showed that interfacial strength evolved rapidly, conforming to a power l… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these PST experiments were performed on a nonpersistent WL consisting of precipitation particles and measurements made on the flat were performed 1 day before the experiments made on slopes (Gauthier, 2007). This indicates that the trend with slope angle may be influenced by the burial time of the WL since sintering and settlement effects can strongly affect snowpack properties within 1 day, especially with the layer of precipitation particles which was tested (Szabo and Schneebeli, 2007;van Herwijnen and Miller, 2013;Podolskiy et al, 2014). Furthermore, Heierli et al (2008) assumed snow cover properties independent of slope angle, which is somewhat questionable since snowpack properties can also change with slope angle, thus obscuring the true slope angle influence.…”
Section: Comparison With the Anticrack Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, these PST experiments were performed on a nonpersistent WL consisting of precipitation particles and measurements made on the flat were performed 1 day before the experiments made on slopes (Gauthier, 2007). This indicates that the trend with slope angle may be influenced by the burial time of the WL since sintering and settlement effects can strongly affect snowpack properties within 1 day, especially with the layer of precipitation particles which was tested (Szabo and Schneebeli, 2007;van Herwijnen and Miller, 2013;Podolskiy et al, 2014). Furthermore, Heierli et al (2008) assumed snow cover properties independent of slope angle, which is somewhat questionable since snowpack properties can also change with slope angle, thus obscuring the true slope angle influence.…”
Section: Comparison With the Anticrack Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, for the experiments, the critical length generally increases with increasing density due to the settlement which induces an increase of Young's modulus and a strengthening of the WL (Zeidler and Jamieson, 2006a, b;Szabo and Schneebeli, 2007;Podolskiy et al, 2014). In contrast, for case #1, a decrease in slab thickness and slope angle induces a decrease in the crack propagation speed (Fig.…”
Section: Crack Propagation Speedmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…So the effect of using different initial conditions in the simulation remains to be addressed in the future. Furthermore, the time-dependence of the sintering force and the strength as observed in Szabo and Schneebeli [2007] and Podolskiy et al [2014] as well as densification effects are not accounted for in our model, but might affect the persistency and the strength of the granules. To further constrain the parameters of the model, the visco-elastic properties of the granules and the strength of the bonds needs to be known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model simpler but also more straightforward to apply to snow. Its model parameters, namely the tensile strength and the sintering force, can be evaluated from laboratory experiments such as tension [Hagenmuller et al, 2014;Sigrist, 2006] and sintering [Podolskiy et al, 2014;Szabo and Schneebeli, 2007] tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%