2012
DOI: 10.5155/eurjchem.3.3.i-i.679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial Board

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two naphthyl planes make dihedral angles of 76.16(8)/59.63(7)° (molecule A/B). In general, there are no unexpected geometric parameters if this structure is compared to similar thiourea compounds, for example, bis[2,2‐diphenyl‐ N ‐(di‐ n ‐propylcarbamothioyl)acetamido]copper(II)13 and bis[4‐bromo‐ N ‐(di‐ n ‐butylcarbamothioyl)benzamido]copper(II) 13. The S‐parameter (Goof, goodness of fit) normally lies in the 0.7–1.0 range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two naphthyl planes make dihedral angles of 76.16(8)/59.63(7)° (molecule A/B). In general, there are no unexpected geometric parameters if this structure is compared to similar thiourea compounds, for example, bis[2,2‐diphenyl‐ N ‐(di‐ n ‐propylcarbamothioyl)acetamido]copper(II)13 and bis[4‐bromo‐ N ‐(di‐ n ‐butylcarbamothioyl)benzamido]copper(II) 13. The S‐parameter (Goof, goodness of fit) normally lies in the 0.7–1.0 range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%