2014
DOI: 10.5123/s1679-49742014000200005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação do processo de fluoretação da água de abastecimento público nos municípios pertencentes ao Grupo de Vigilância Sanitária XV-Bauru, no período de 2002 a 2011

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
4
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the discrepancies of the results in some municipalities in the month of July, there was a satisfactory recovery of the quality levels of fluoridation in the following months. This may show that monitoring has, indeed, fulfilled its role through enforcement actions and adoption of measures to guarantee access to high quality of treated and fluoridated water (Stancari et al, 2014). However, a study conducted in municipalities in Brazil with more than 50,000 inhabitants evidenced the need to formulate strategies for monitoring fluoridation in the country, because only 53.0% of fluoridated municipalities conducted monitoring based on external control data .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the discrepancies of the results in some municipalities in the month of July, there was a satisfactory recovery of the quality levels of fluoridation in the following months. This may show that monitoring has, indeed, fulfilled its role through enforcement actions and adoption of measures to guarantee access to high quality of treated and fluoridated water (Stancari et al, 2014). However, a study conducted in municipalities in Brazil with more than 50,000 inhabitants evidenced the need to formulate strategies for monitoring fluoridation in the country, because only 53.0% of fluoridated municipalities conducted monitoring based on external control data .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the discrepancies of the results in some municipalities in the month of July, there was a satisfactory recovery of the quality levels of fluoridation in the following months. This may show that monitoring has, indeed, fulfilled its role through enforcement actions and adoption of measures to guarantee access to high quality of treated and fluoridated water (Stancari et al, 2014). However, a study conducted in municipalities in Brazil with more than 50,000 inhabitants evidenced the need to formulate strategies for monitoring fluoridation in the country, because only 53.0% of fluoridated municipalities conducted monitoring based on external control data The differences related to the rates of optimal fluoride levels observed between the criteria may be associated to some points.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Queiroz et al (2012) also pointed out that small municipalities have difficulties in developing any corrective action based on the results of the analyses of water monitoring reports. In smaller municipalities, the lack of specialized manpower and the lack of training for the professionals that operate water treatment plants, and the lack of inspection structure and experience in controlling the fluoridation process are possible causes for difficulties in maintaining the appropriate concentrations of fluoride in public utilities' water supplies (Stancari et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O heterocontrole tem sido motivado para garantir a eficácia e a segurança da fluoretação 24 , e vários estudos trazem resultados do heterocontrole mostrando variações significativas na concentração de fluoreto em algumas localidades brasileiras [25][26][27][28] . Diante da importância da fluoretação para a saúde pública e da importância do monitoramento das concentrações adequadas de fluoreto na água de abastecimento público, este trabalho teve por objetivo analisar o heterocontrole da fluoretação de municípios com população acima de 50 mil habitantes da Região Metropolitana de Curitiba, no Paraná, nos anos de 2014 e 2015.…”
Section: ▄ Introduçãounclassified