2022
DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2022.e66717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise empírico-retórica do discurso (AERD) da sentença do caso terra indígena Raposa Serra do Sol (TIRSS)

Abstract: O artigo aplica o método Análise Empírico-Retórica do Discurso (AERD) (REIS, 2013) na sentença do caso Terra Indígena Raposa Serra do Sol, objetivando evidenciar a construção do conceito fato indígena a substituir o indigenato como um processo argumentativo eivado de equivocada e estereotipada interpretação do STF sobre a realidade dos Povos Indígenas. Afirma-se, em hipótese, o equívoco da utilização do “marco temporal” autorizativo da supressão e diminuição de terras já demarcadas, inclusive pela Segunda Turm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While indigenous young people are some of the most vulnerable people globally and are often disproportionately affected by political decisions, they are excluded from decision-making processes ( 14 , 15 , 27 ). The inclusion of young people is an important catalyst in policy and program advancement, as it offers an intergenerational perspective to support present and future generations vulnerable to the immediate and distal impacts of climate change ( 28 31 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While indigenous young people are some of the most vulnerable people globally and are often disproportionately affected by political decisions, they are excluded from decision-making processes ( 14 , 15 , 27 ). The inclusion of young people is an important catalyst in policy and program advancement, as it offers an intergenerational perspective to support present and future generations vulnerable to the immediate and distal impacts of climate change ( 28 31 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%