2013
DOI: 10.4322/rbeb.2013.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmenting mammographic microcalcifications using a semi-automatic procedure based on Otsu s method and morphological filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AOM cluster values ranged from 0.59 to 0.64 for intra and interobserver agreement analyses, respectively, being similar to the results reported by other studies. 15,42 In case of amorphous MC clusters, a trend for decreased values of AOM cluster was observed, as compared to other morphology types of MC clusters, mainly attributed to inherent morphological characteristics of this specific morphology type, challenging segmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…AOM cluster values ranged from 0.59 to 0.64 for intra and interobserver agreement analyses, respectively, being similar to the results reported by other studies. 15,42 In case of amorphous MC clusters, a trend for decreased values of AOM cluster was observed, as compared to other morphology types of MC clusters, mainly attributed to inherent morphological characteristics of this specific morphology type, challenging segmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Quantitative metrics have been utilized to assess accuracy of segmentation methods on real and simulated MCs in mammography. 15,16,18,42 In this study, in absence of ground truth with respect to actual individual MC boundaries, quantitative metrics are utilized to quantify inter and intraobserver agreements for the proposed segmentation method. Two radiologists (denoted as R1 and R2), experienced in mammography (6 yr for R1 and 14 yr for R2), were independently asked to segment MC particles within clusters.…”
Section: D1 Segmentation Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To deal with this problem, many of the methods proposed in the literature have used semi-automatic segmentation (Rabben et al, 2000;Mahdavi et al, 2011;Duarte et al, 2013;Ni et al, 2015), in which a human localizes a suitable region, and then segmentation algorithms delineate the selected region. This study was designed to automatically detect ROIs and delineate their boundaries.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, several approaches were proposed to segment microcalcifications [15][16][17][18] such as active contours [16,19], curvelet moments [20], wavelet analysis [21][22][23], fractal analysis [24][25][26], multifractal analysis [27,28] and morphological filters [29][30][31][32] in order to reduce human subjectivity in diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%