2013
DOI: 10.4322/polimeros.2014.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Phthalates in Polymer Materials Comparison of GC/MS and GC/ECD methods

Abstract: The paper presents two methods for determination of phthalates in polymer materials. The methods compared were gas chromatography combined with the mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and gas chromatography with electron capture detector (GC/ECD). The GC/ECD technique was chosen for this comparison, because the ECD detector was one of few capable of detecting phthalates. In both cases the same procedure of sample preparation with ultrasonic extraction was applied. Overall recoveries were 76-100 % with relative of standa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It becomes decisive from previous studies that gas chromatography (GC) is a reliable technique to isolate DEHP from different source material. 25,26 A total ion chromatogram derived from a gas chromatographic analysis (Figure 1) shows a single, significant peak with 100% relative abundance (RA) at the retention time 33.09 minutes. The peak covers 86.31% of the total area of the chromatogram indicating high concentration for the detection of DEHP in the sample.…”
Section: Experimental Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It becomes decisive from previous studies that gas chromatography (GC) is a reliable technique to isolate DEHP from different source material. 25,26 A total ion chromatogram derived from a gas chromatographic analysis (Figure 1) shows a single, significant peak with 100% relative abundance (RA) at the retention time 33.09 minutes. The peak covers 86.31% of the total area of the chromatogram indicating high concentration for the detection of DEHP in the sample.…”
Section: Experimental Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of different solvents for extraction can have significant effects on the discrimination of target analytes from the sample matrix, as well as the extraction recoveries [ 32 ]. Although the advantage of this sample preparation is simple without purification, the matrix effect based on the different organic plastic additives in infusion sets can lead to false results of target analytes [ 33 ]. As an extraction solvent after the polymer dissolution, hexane was chosen because the partitioning of the extract with hexane was able to minimize matrix interferences compared with other solvents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of the PAHs, phenols, (phenol, o-cresol, p-cresol and m-cresol) and selected alkylphenols was determined in the gas phase. The conditions of the sample preparation and GC-MS analysis of the selected compounds were set according to the methods described by Janoszka et al [52] for biomass burning markers, as well as according to the methods of Czaplicka et al [53] for the PAHs, Czaplicka and Kaczmarczyk [54] for the phenols, Jaworek and Czaplicka [55] for the esters of phthalic acid, and Li et al [56] for the selected alkylphenols. The samples testing procedures are presented in Figure 2.…”
Section: Determination Of Particulate Organic Compounds In the Gas And Solid Phasementioning
confidence: 99%