2016
DOI: 10.4301/s1807-17752016000300008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel latent factor model for recommender system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The second major option relies on model-based variable completion, such as the ones presented in [ 28 , 50 ]. Most of these procedures consist of Singular Value Decomposition variants, commonly used in biological and medical applications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second major option relies on model-based variable completion, such as the ones presented in [ 28 , 50 ]. Most of these procedures consist of Singular Value Decomposition variants, commonly used in biological and medical applications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the FunkSVD algorithm transforms solving two optimal low-rank matrices into optimization problems. We need to define a loss function [14] such as (1), which is used to control the deviation of the model so that the gap between the predicted score and the actual score is as small as possible. Where T is the data set, x m is the user feature matrix-vector, and y n is the item feature matrix-vector.…”
Section: A Traditional Funksvd Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where T is the data set, x m is the user feature matrix-vector, and y n is the item feature matrix-vector. However, when the FunkSVD algorithm is applied to the recommendation system, a regularization term is usually added to the loss function to control the variance of the model and prevent over-coupling, that is, to obtain a simple hidden factor vector [14]:…”
Section: A Traditional Funksvd Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate accuracy, the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) and MAE (Mean Absolute Error) are popular metrics in RS domain research (Kumar, 2016). Since, RMSE gives more weightage to larger values of errors while MAE gives equal weightage to all values of errors, RMSE is preferred over MAE while evaluating the performance of RS.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%