2020
DOI: 10.4136/ambi-agua.2454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best practice production to reduce the water footprint of dairy milk

Abstract: This study evaluated the impact of diet as a mitigation action to improve the water efficiency of lactating cows. An intensive pasture dairy system was considered to calculate direct and indirect water use. Group 1 was fed with a diet containing 20% crude protein content. The crude protein content of Group 2 was adjusted according to milk production, ranging from 23% to 14.5%. The total water footprints had a value of 502.4 L kg-1 fat protein corrected milk for Group 1 and 451.2 L kg-1 fat protein corrected mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation of the drinking water requirements of the animals is in line with typical practices for the region. Nevertheless, the values were lower than those by Palhares et al ( 2020 ), who determined the drinking water intake for lactating cows by daily recording and measuring. For instance, water footprints observed by Palhares et al ( 2020 ) were 502.4 L per 1 kg FPCM for an animal group fed with a 20% crude protein content diet (group 1) and 451.2 L per 1 kg FPCM for another animal group fed with a diet adjusted according to its milk production (group 2).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The estimation of the drinking water requirements of the animals is in line with typical practices for the region. Nevertheless, the values were lower than those by Palhares et al ( 2020 ), who determined the drinking water intake for lactating cows by daily recording and measuring. For instance, water footprints observed by Palhares et al ( 2020 ) were 502.4 L per 1 kg FPCM for an animal group fed with a 20% crude protein content diet (group 1) and 451.2 L per 1 kg FPCM for another animal group fed with a diet adjusted according to its milk production (group 2).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Water is an essential input in dairy farms and demanded for cleaning, for irrigation purposes and for watering the herd (Palhares et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a direct method to assess the system and evaluate sustainability and it is applicable to many agricultural activities. The blue WF of milk production was calculated per unit kg of FPCM [4,14]. This was achieved by dividing the FPCM [2] from the direct farm water use (washing, spraying/cooling and drinking water of dairy cattle, including lactating cows, dry cows, heifers and calves).…”
Section: Farm-specific Data For Blue Wf Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%