2019
DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.45670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Royal jelly production with queens produced by single and double grafting in Africanized honeybee colonies

Abstract: The objective of this research was to evaluate royal jelly production from Africanized honeybee queens of different lineages (lineage selected for honey production, lineage selected for royal jelly production and unselected) produced by single and double grafting and to compare royal jelly production among their offspring. Data were tested by double factorial analysis of variance and the means were compared by Tukey test at 5%. The parameters evaluated were: queen weight at emergence, percentage of larvae acce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apis mellifera bees housed in five-frame hives from November to May produced around 1.80 g/colony/ harvest and larval acceptances between 29 and 43% (Garcia and Couto, 2005;Toledo et al, 2010;Pereira et al, 2019). From June to December in the same region, production of 3.6 g/colony/harvest was reported with an average of 136.5 mg per cell cup and 39.5% cell acceptance using five-frame colonies (Santos et al, 2019), values that agree with the results obtained in this experiment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Apis mellifera bees housed in five-frame hives from November to May produced around 1.80 g/colony/ harvest and larval acceptances between 29 and 43% (Garcia and Couto, 2005;Toledo et al, 2010;Pereira et al, 2019). From June to December in the same region, production of 3.6 g/colony/harvest was reported with an average of 136.5 mg per cell cup and 39.5% cell acceptance using five-frame colonies (Santos et al, 2019), values that agree with the results obtained in this experiment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%