2016
DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v38i1.29150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>Protected fat and variable level of protein in diets of crossbreed cows in early lactation

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Current study evaluated the inclusion of protected fat and different levels of crude protein (CP) in the diet of crossbreed cows in early lactation. Twelve cows were distributed in a 4 x 4 factorial design, with four treatments (12 or 16% CP, with or without MEGALAC-E ® ). Statistical analyzes with ANOVA and Pearson's linear correlation procedures were performed. Protected fat did not affect intake of dry matter (DM) and organic matter (OM) (p > 0.05). Increased CP raised consumption of CP and EE and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sharma et al (2016) indicated that protein; lactose and solid not fat content did not varied between the groups. Souza Júnior et al (2016) suggested no difference (P>0.05) on milk composition due to protected fat or CP rates. In current study, energy of milk was significantly (P≤ 0.05) higher in DF groups than those of corroborating results by Zeedan et al (2014) and S Sa af fa aa a (2015).…”
Section: Milk Yield and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sharma et al (2016) indicated that protein; lactose and solid not fat content did not varied between the groups. Souza Júnior et al (2016) suggested no difference (P>0.05) on milk composition due to protected fat or CP rates. In current study, energy of milk was significantly (P≤ 0.05) higher in DF groups than those of corroborating results by Zeedan et al (2014) and S Sa af fa aa a (2015).…”
Section: Milk Yield and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Sharma et al (2016) indicated that buffaloes consumed DM during post-partum between the groups (CG and SG) were non-significant. Souza Júnior et al (2016) indicated that treatments (MEGALAC) had no effect on consumption of dry matter (DM). On the other hand; Abu El-Hamd et al (2012) suggested that the average DM (kg/d/h) during postpartum periods were higher in G 2 than G 1 of cows.…”
Section: C= Control Df3=3% Df (Basedon Dm Intake) and Df5=5% Df (Basmentioning
confidence: 99%