2014
DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v36i3.17485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>Calibration and testing of an agrometeorological model for the estimation of soybean yields in different Brazilian regions

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This study was designed to calibrate and test an agrometeorological model over 18 growing seasons in three soybean production areas in Brazil: Passo Fundo (Rio Grande do Sul State), Londrina (Paraná State), and Dourados (Mato Grosso do Sul State). The soybean potential yield (Yp) was determined by two methods: estimated using the FAO Agroecological Zone Model or based on the maximum yield published by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), increased by 10, 20 and 30%. The estimat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the agrometeorological modelling papers for yield estimation, a few are exclusive dedicated to understand the water deficiencies influence at different phenological phases. For annual crops, this relation is more commonly studied, as the model tested by Monteiro and Sentelhas (2014) that used relative water deficiency at phenological phases to the calculation of actual soybean yield at different Brazil regions. For perennial crops, such analysis are not common, for most of "Valência" orange agrometeorological modelling papers search to understand effects of water stress at citrus orchards in order to determine the irrigation deficit, mainly at flowering (Pérez-Pérez et al, 2009; Roccuzzo et al, 2014) and not to estimate yield and quality of the fruits in function of the monthly water deficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the agrometeorological modelling papers for yield estimation, a few are exclusive dedicated to understand the water deficiencies influence at different phenological phases. For annual crops, this relation is more commonly studied, as the model tested by Monteiro and Sentelhas (2014) that used relative water deficiency at phenological phases to the calculation of actual soybean yield at different Brazil regions. For perennial crops, such analysis are not common, for most of "Valência" orange agrometeorological modelling papers search to understand effects of water stress at citrus orchards in order to determine the irrigation deficit, mainly at flowering (Pérez-Pérez et al, 2009; Roccuzzo et al, 2014) and not to estimate yield and quality of the fruits in function of the monthly water deficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to presenting a large difference in phase II, the results of Suyker & Verma [48] also showed a large difference in phase IV-2. The comparison of the K c EEFlux to the K c determined by Monteiro & Sentelhas [49] showed the best agreements (d = 0.90) ( Fig 7D) and also showed a lower K c difference in phase II, which did not occur in the other comparisons.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Eta And Kc Eeflux With The Mfaomentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This author obtained a correlation of 0.85 between observed and estimated values using the Jensen model modified to estimate the soybean crop yield in the State of Rio Grande do Sul. Using an agrometeorological model, Monteiro and Sentelhas (2014) obtained an R 2 of 0.64 when estimating soybean productivity in different regions. The use of artificial neural networks to estimate soybean yield is viable, since the back propagation training technique allowed the relationship between the independent variables (soybean agronomic characteristics, growth habit and population density) and soybean yield to be identified with high precision (72%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soybean productivity was successfully estimated in studies by Monteiro and Sentelhas (2014) using an agrometeorological model. The main agronomic characteristics that are influenced by the different behaviors of each cultivar include the number of branches produced per plant, number of pods and seeds per plant, number of internodes, insertion of the first pod, stem diameter, plant height and, obviously, grain production (Liu et al, 2010;Passos et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%