2014
DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v36i1.16919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>Genetic control of partial resistance to Asian soybean rust</b> doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v36i1.16919

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The genetic control of rust resistance was studied using the Caiapônia x IAC-100 and Luziânia x Potenza crosses. The F 2 and F 3 generations were evaluated. Rust severity was quantified through visual assessment of the middle third of three leaflets per plant and performed by three different evaluators; the average score was calculated foreach individual plant. From these data, we estimated the mean and variance of the genetic components by employing the weighted least squares method. The estimated n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field, Maphosa et al (16) verified that such variability, isolate (genotype) x year (season), had a great impact on the severity of ASR. Therefore, there may be a greater effect of the environment on the disease severity (17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field, Maphosa et al (16) verified that such variability, isolate (genotype) x year (season), had a great impact on the severity of ASR. Therefore, there may be a greater effect of the environment on the disease severity (17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, those genotypes have shown a lower disease severity compared to other studies that have identified potential sources of genetic resistance to this disease (Ribeiro et al, 2009;Glasenappet al, 2015). Still, the soybean lines' resistance to soybean rust severity may vary over time and it is associated with the genotype, the type of resistance mechanism according to the environmental factors or physiological effects (Martins and Juliatti, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result supports the appearance of a high FI in susceptible genotypes in the experiment, as presented by the genotype 57 (F5:6 BRSGO Caiapônia x IAC100, PL 01 (N50, D05) Bulk F5 obtained with high FI (285.2) as well as other susceptible genotypes, indicating the genetic segregation in obtaining the initial population in the F2 generation. Genotype 46 also obtained partial resistance to soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) on field, in generation F4:5, where it was evaluated the partial resistance of soybean genotypes to the fungus; among the genotypes, significant differences appeared in number of average pustules and severity at 12 days after inoculation (Martins and Juliatti, 2012). The variety Engopa 316 RR -Sel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%