2012
DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.11627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of soil penetration resistance using statistical analyses and artificial neural networks

Abstract: ABSTRACT. An important factor for the evaluation of an agricultural system's sustainability is the monitoring of soil quality via its physical attributes. The physical attributes of soil, such as soil penetration resistance, can be used to monitor and evaluate the soil's quality. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have been employed to solve many problems in agriculture, and the use of this technique can be considered an alternative approach for predicting the penetration resistance produced by the soil's basic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the dataset of the 108 trials was normalized in the interval from 0 to 1, according to Chagas et al (2010), and randomly divided into subsets: training subset data (98 trials) and validation subset data (10 trials); the latter was used for the discussion of the results of the model. As in Santos et al (2012), the strategy of cross-validation was employed in this study, with 20% of the training data used to estimate the performance of the ANN and determine the moment to interrupt the training, in order to avoid excessive training.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the dataset of the 108 trials was normalized in the interval from 0 to 1, according to Chagas et al (2010), and randomly divided into subsets: training subset data (98 trials) and validation subset data (10 trials); the latter was used for the discussion of the results of the model. As in Santos et al (2012), the strategy of cross-validation was employed in this study, with 20% of the training data used to estimate the performance of the ANN and determine the moment to interrupt the training, in order to avoid excessive training.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNs can be applied in many areas, like soil digital mapping based on soil-landscape relationships (Arruda et al, 2013), classification of degradation levels of pastures (Chagas et al, 2009), rainfall erosivity (Moreira et al, 2006, estimation of reference evapotranspiration through air temperature data (Alves Sobrinho et al, 2011), modeling of soil penetration resistance (Santos et al, 2012) or even identification and classification of soybean cultivars by planting region (Galão et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gubiani et al (2011) found that the parameterized regression models are not general and cannot be readily applied to other soils because of significant variations in MC and BD among different soils properties due to disparities in texture, pore size distribution or particle density. Santos et al (2012) employed anartificial neural networks model for predicting the penetration resistance produced by the soil's basic properties, such as BD and MC. They showed that CI is associated with BD and MC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil cone index could also be a function of soil electrical conductivity (Abbaspour-Gilandeh et al, 2011). Santos et al (2012) used statistical analyses and ANNs for predicting soil penetration resistance based on the soil bulk density and water content. Results showed that ANNs architecture 2-2-2-1 presented an RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) of value less than 0.085, an R 2 equal to 0.98 and a global mean error of approximately 6.75%, whereas the model obtained from statistical analyses presented an RMSE of 0.951 and an R 2 of 0.92.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%