2014
DOI: 10.3922/j.psns.2014.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the possibility of using reaction time to study false memories.

Abstract: Research on false memories has extensively used the recognition and recollection of lists of semantically associated words, called the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. In the DRM procedure, the measure of accuracy/errors is usually the main dependent variable. In this paper we review research that integrated reaction time measures into the DRM paradigm and discuss the future contributions of measures of reaction time to the understanding of false memories.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason is that critical lures are semantically similar to words in the original lists, that is the true targets. Similar to Lopes and Garcia's (2014) results, the current results showed that participants exhibited priming effect to critical lures since these words are associated with words in the original lists. In other words, items in the original lists primed the critical lures in the test phase resulting in fast responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason is that critical lures are semantically similar to words in the original lists, that is the true targets. Similar to Lopes and Garcia's (2014) results, the current results showed that participants exhibited priming effect to critical lures since these words are associated with words in the original lists. In other words, items in the original lists primed the critical lures in the test phase resulting in fast responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Participants responded faster to critical lures than they did to new items (words that were not in the original lists). Lopes and Garcia (2014) have shown that participants in their experiment showed similar speed in responding to critical lures and true targets. The reason is that critical lures are semantically similar to words in the original lists, that is the true targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…On the other hand, an examination of the reaction time of false and true memory in our study showed that false memory has a longer reaction time than true memory. Reaction time is defined as the time elapsed between stimulus input and response output that provides a powerful way to relate physical events to mental events, and the underlying cognitive process such as perception, attention, and memory (Lopes & Garcia, 2014). The increase of RTs for false memories does not depend on the presence of the test stimulus (positive response) or its absence (negative response).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin & Saffran, 1992). Such evidence make the possibility of studying FM in short-term tasks promising, and allow for the use of reaction time (RT) as a dependent variable in combination with the commonly used accuracy measures (Galera & Lopes, 1995;Lopes & Garcia, 2014). The greatest advantage of such approach is that it can provide finer-grained knowledge about basic memory processes in comparison to accuracy measures alone (Balota & Yap, 2011;Luce, 1986;Welford, 1980).…”
Section: False Memories In Short-term Tasks: Contributions Of Reactiomentioning
confidence: 99%