2014
DOI: 10.3922/j.psns.2014.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of the startle response in verbal aggressors: Differences among stimuli with distinct affective social content.

Abstract: The emotional response to socially affective stimuli is an important variable to understand aggression. Research is lacking on the psychophysiological basis of verbal aggressiveness that would allow the identification of these emotional responses. The aim of the present study was to investigate modulation of the startle response in verbal aggressors during the presentation of visual stimuli with different affective social content. Acoustic startle probes were administered to 29 verbal aggressors and 28 non-ver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that use these measures combine the presentation of stimuli (e.g., pictures) with different affective social content and evaluate physiological reactions (e.g., facial electromyography, heart rate [HR], and skin conductance response [SCR]; Bradley, Codispoti, Cuthbert, & Lang, 2001; Gantiva, Díaz, Ospina, Gutierrez, & Romo-Gonzalez, 2014). These types of studies have the advantage of evaluating automatic reactions that are under little voluntary control, which decreases the bias of social desirability of the self-report measures (Vachon et al, 2014) or errors in the recognition of facial expressions in studies that evaluate facial/gestural reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that use these measures combine the presentation of stimuli (e.g., pictures) with different affective social content and evaluate physiological reactions (e.g., facial electromyography, heart rate [HR], and skin conductance response [SCR]; Bradley, Codispoti, Cuthbert, & Lang, 2001; Gantiva, Díaz, Ospina, Gutierrez, & Romo-Gonzalez, 2014). These types of studies have the advantage of evaluating automatic reactions that are under little voluntary control, which decreases the bias of social desirability of the self-report measures (Vachon et al, 2014) or errors in the recognition of facial expressions in studies that evaluate facial/gestural reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finalmente, algunas limitaciones deben ser tenidas en cuenta, pese a que este estudio se llevó a cabo en estudiantes universitarios, las investigaciones realizadas en diferentes países han utilizado poblaciones similares (Dufey et al, 2011;Gantiva et al, 2011;Lang et al, 1999;Lang et al, 2008;Moltó et al, 1999;Silva, 2011;Verschuere et al, 2001;Vila et al, 2001), y los resultados han demostrado ser confiables como punto de referencia para llevar a cabo investigaciones posteriores en poblaciones específicas, por ejemplo consumidores de sustancias psicoactivas (Gantiva, Rodriguez, Arias, & Rubio, 2012;Muñoz et al, 2009), personas agresivas (Gantiva, Díaz, Ospina, Gutierrez, & Romo-Gonzalez, 2014), con niveles significativos de ansiedad (Lang, Davis, & Öhman, 2000), depresión (Taubitz, Robinson, & Larson, 2013), entre otras.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified