2013
DOI: 10.3922/j.psns.2013.3.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of spatial attention to visual targets by emotional environmental sounds.

Abstract: Previous research has shown that visual spatial attention can be modulated by emotional prosody cues, but it is not known whether such crossmodal modulation of visual attention is associated with the engagement or disengagement of attentional resources. To test this, we employed a modified spatial cueing task, where participants indicated whether a visual target appeared either on the left or the right, after hearing a spatially non-predictive peripheral sound. Prior studies using prosody cues have found that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, evidence that emotion cues from the auditory modality can also influence non-emotional (basic) visual information processing is nearly missing. One study investigated the influence of emotional sounds on visual attention in a spatial cueing paradigm ( Harrison and Davies, 2013 ). Here, non-speech environmental sounds from the IADS were presented spatially matched to the locations of subsequent visual targets.…”
Section: Audio–visual Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, evidence that emotion cues from the auditory modality can also influence non-emotional (basic) visual information processing is nearly missing. One study investigated the influence of emotional sounds on visual attention in a spatial cueing paradigm ( Harrison and Davies, 2013 ). Here, non-speech environmental sounds from the IADS were presented spatially matched to the locations of subsequent visual targets.…”
Section: Audio–visual Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on prior studies on the modulation of spatial attention to visual targets by auditory stimuli (Harrison and Davies, 2013;Wang et al, 2019a;Evans, 2020) and a power analysis using G * Power Version 3.1.9.2 (Faul et al, 2007) conducted for a repeated measurement ANOVA to detect a medium interaction effect of f = 0.25 with a statistical power of 0.95 and a significance level of 0.05, we aimed to recruit a sample size that included a minimum of 36 participants.…”
Section: Experiments 2 Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If you hear the familiar call of friends, you will immediately look toward them with a smile. In other words, sounds serve as warnings or rewarding signals in daily life that can be critical for survival and finetune our actions (Harrison and Davies, 2013;Gerdes et al, 2020;McDougall et al, 2020). A recent study has investigated auditory attentional bias employing white noise as negative auditory cue (Wang et al, 2019a), but white noise lacks ecological validity.…”
Section: Attentional Bias For Positive Emotional Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when emotionally valenced stimuli were auditorily presented, recognition of visually presented neutral stimuli was enhanced ( Zeelenberg and Bocanegra, 2010 ). Furthermore, another study found behavioral effects of emotional sounds on visual processing only when visual items were presented on the right visual hemifield 2 ( Harrison and Davies, 2013 ; see Brosch et al, 2008 for a study in which emotionally valenced pseudowords were used). Thus, these studies suggest that auditory emotional stimuli affect visual processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 It is worth clarifying at this point that in Table 1 in Gerdes et al (2014) , the study by Harrison and Davies (2013 , p. 5) is perhaps mistakenly cited as an example of no influence of emotional sounds on a visual task but in the text this mistake is not present. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%