2021
DOI: 10.36783/18069657rbcs20210066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaking settings to reduce the breakdown of Entisol fragile particles in texture analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disturbed samples were used to determine the particle size distribution, separating between cobbles and coarse gravel (CCG, 250 -20 mm), medium and fine gravel (MFG, 20 -2 mm), coarse sand (CS, 2 -0.25 mm), fine sand (FS, 0.25 -0.05 mm), silt (0.05 -0.002 mm) and clay (< 0.002 mm) (Schoeneberger et al, 2012). Sand, silt, and clay were determined by shaking 20 g of the soil fraction passed in a 2 mm mesh sieve in a solution of 1 mol L -1 NaOH with a horizontal reciprocating shaking during (i) 4 h and with nylon spheres for soils of site B and C (not containing fragile sand particles) (Suzuki et al, 2015) and (ii) 2 h and without nylon spheres for soil A, due to the presence of fragile sand particles (Gubiani et al, 2021a). The sand fraction was separated by washing the dispersed sample on a 0.053 mm mesh sieve and the clay fraction was determined with the pipette method (Gee and Or, 2002), while silt was calculated as the remaining part after subtracting sand and clay from the whole sample mass.…”
Section: Particle Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disturbed samples were used to determine the particle size distribution, separating between cobbles and coarse gravel (CCG, 250 -20 mm), medium and fine gravel (MFG, 20 -2 mm), coarse sand (CS, 2 -0.25 mm), fine sand (FS, 0.25 -0.05 mm), silt (0.05 -0.002 mm) and clay (< 0.002 mm) (Schoeneberger et al, 2012). Sand, silt, and clay were determined by shaking 20 g of the soil fraction passed in a 2 mm mesh sieve in a solution of 1 mol L -1 NaOH with a horizontal reciprocating shaking during (i) 4 h and with nylon spheres for soils of site B and C (not containing fragile sand particles) (Suzuki et al, 2015) and (ii) 2 h and without nylon spheres for soil A, due to the presence of fragile sand particles (Gubiani et al, 2021a). The sand fraction was separated by washing the dispersed sample on a 0.053 mm mesh sieve and the clay fraction was determined with the pipette method (Gee and Or, 2002), while silt was calculated as the remaining part after subtracting sand and clay from the whole sample mass.…”
Section: Particle Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant negative correlations between fine and coarse fractions were not found. That indicated that the increase of fine particles from destroyed large particles during shaking was not a substantial factor in PSD determination (Gurbani et al., 2021; Suzuki et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disturbed samples were used to determine the particle size distribution, separating between cobbles and coarse gravel (CCG, 250–20 mm), medium and fine gravel (MFG, 20–2 mm), coarse sand (CS, 2–0.25 mm), fine sand (FS, 0.25–0.05 mm), silt (0.05–0.002 mm) and clay (˂0.002 mm) (Schoeneberger et al, 2012). Sand, silt, and clay were determined by shaking 20 g of the soil fraction passed through a sieve of 2 mm mesh in a solution of 1 mol L −1 NaOH with a horizontal reciprocating shaking during (i) 4 h with nylon spheres for soils of site B and C (not containing fragile sand particles) (Suzuki et al, 2015) and (ii) 2 h without nylon spheres for soil A, due to the presence of fragile sand particles (Gubiani et al, 2021a). The sand fraction was separated by washing the dispersed sample on a sieve with a 0.053 mm mesh and the clay fraction was determined with the pipette method (Gee & Or, 2002), while silt was calculated as the remaining part after subtracting sand and clay from the whole sample mass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%