Evaluation of Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients with Coronary Artery Ectasia

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is defined by focal enlargement of the coronary artery exceeding 1.5 times the adjacent normal segment. CAE can often cause arrhythmias, heart failure, sudden death, and myocardial ischemia. Ischemia due to microvascular dysfunction may be responsible for the ventricular heterogeneity in CAE. Objectives:The aim of our study was to evaluate the frontal QRS-T angle in patients with CAE.Methods: Our study included 55 patients with CAE and 50 individuals in the control group. Demographic characteristics and electrocardiographic parameters were compared between the two groups. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared using unpaired Student's t-test. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The frontal QRS-T angle was calculated from 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) using the automatic report from the electrocardiography machine. Results:The average age of patients with CAE was 63.2 ± 3.4 years, with 18 women among them. The control group had an average age of 61.1 ± 3.2 years, with 28 women included. There was no significant difference in demographic parameters between the two groups. Compared to the control group, patients with CAE had significantly wider frontal QRS-T angle (p < 0.001), as well as longer QTmax duration, p = 0.002; Tp-Te interval, p = 0.02; and QT dispersion (QTd), p = 0.04. Conclusion:The frontal QRS-T angle can be calculated easily and time-efficiently using surface electrocardiography. In this study, we showed for the first time that the frontal QRS-T angle was significantly increased in patients with CAE.

Venturing into Uncharted Territories: Unveiling Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients with Coronary Artery Ectasia

“…As we eagerly await further research to validate and expand upon these findings, the potential for integrating the frontal QRS-T angle into routine clinical practice as a risk stratification tool offers a glimmer of hope for enhancing the care and outcomes of patients with CAE. We commend the authors of this article 1 for their dedication to advancing cardiovascular science and eagerly await the insights their work will provide.…”