2020
DOI: 10.36660/abc.20190683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacto dos Índices Aterogênicos em Estenose do Enxerto de Veia Safena

Abstract: Fundamento: Os enxertos de veias safenas (EVS) são frequentemente usados em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio (CRM). Objetivos: Avaliar as relações entre índices aterogênicos e estenose de EVS. Métodos: No total, 534 pacientes (27,7% mulheres, com idade média de 65±8,4 anos) submetidos a CRM e angiografia coronariana eletiva foram incluídos no estudo. Pacientes com pelo menos uma estenose EVS ≥50% foram alocados ao grupo estenose EVS (+) (n=259) e pacientes sem estenose foram cla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean angiographic follow-up was 33.5 months (standard deviation (SD) 29.2), with a median of 16.6 months (IQR 12-45.5); 4 studies had at least 5-year follow-up. 14,15,28,29 The mean overall SVG patency rate was 80.4% (SD 14.3, median 82.6%, IQR 79.1−90.5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean angiographic follow-up was 33.5 months (standard deviation (SD) 29.2), with a median of 16.6 months (IQR 12-45.5); 4 studies had at least 5-year follow-up. 14,15,28,29 The mean overall SVG patency rate was 80.4% (SD 14.3, median 82.6%, IQR 79.1−90.5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 2092 screened articles, a total of 17 studies, published between 1993 and 2021, were included in the present analysis. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] The PRISMA flow diagram outlining the study selection process and the quality of included studies according to the NOS are provided in Supporting Information: Figure 4 and Supporting Information: Table 3, respectively. All studies were of high quality (NOS score 8−9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%