2021
DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory symptoms (COPD Assessment Test and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scores) and GOLD-ABCD COPD classification: the LASSYC study

Abstract: Objective: To assess the frequency and severity of 24-hour respiratory symptoms according to COPD GOLD-ABCD classification (2017-version), the distribution of the patients with COPD into GOLD categories using mMRC (=2) or CAT (=10) scores, and agreement between these cut-off points. Methods: In this cross-sectional study (LASSYC study), 24-hour day respiratory symptoms were assessed by the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS) questionnaire, Nighttime Symptoms of COPD Instrument (NiSCI), Early Morning… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total CAT score was calculated for each individual by summing the points for each CAT variable, ranging from 0 to 40. mMRC respiratory validated questionnaire has a 5-point scoring range (0-4) based on the severity of dyspnea. [17] The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the First A liated Hospital, Collage of Medicine, Zhejiang university. All the study participants were aware of the study's purpose, risks, and bene ts, gave informed consent and signed written consent forms.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total CAT score was calculated for each individual by summing the points for each CAT variable, ranging from 0 to 40. mMRC respiratory validated questionnaire has a 5-point scoring range (0-4) based on the severity of dyspnea. [17] The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the First A liated Hospital, Collage of Medicine, Zhejiang university. All the study participants were aware of the study's purpose, risks, and bene ts, gave informed consent and signed written consent forms.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%