2019
DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020gs4816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative overview of innovation and patent filings in Radiopharmacy

Abstract: Objective To expose the current situation of the Brazilian Nuclear Medicine in relation to innovation, taking into account the Intellectual Property protection and the particularities of this field.Methods The number and the origin of patents filings from Brazil, United States and European Patent Convention countries were retrospectively compared in a 20-year period.Results The number of accumulated patents filings of conventional pharmaceuticals was ten times higher compared to the radiopharmaceuticals in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Major drawbacks on patent counts have also been described. For instance, many patented inventions are not followed by an industrial application or market introduction, while others are not patentable or hardly highlighted because of different regulations across the countries . However, besides these significant limitations, the patent count is still considered a valuable and simple measure for innovation, correlating the number of patents as direct R&D output.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major drawbacks on patent counts have also been described. For instance, many patented inventions are not followed by an industrial application or market introduction, while others are not patentable or hardly highlighted because of different regulations across the countries . However, besides these significant limitations, the patent count is still considered a valuable and simple measure for innovation, correlating the number of patents as direct R&D output.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%