2003
DOI: 10.2223/jped.1108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute myeloid leukemia in childhood: fifteen-year experience in a single institution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless it is similar to that reported by the Dutch group [26][27][28]. It is lower than the 26 to 36% reported by other Latin-American groups, but our study is not multicentre like theirs [29,30] Improvement of our strategies of prophylaxis and therapy for neutropenic patients should be explored in future trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Nevertheless it is similar to that reported by the Dutch group [26][27][28]. It is lower than the 26 to 36% reported by other Latin-American groups, but our study is not multicentre like theirs [29,30] Improvement of our strategies of prophylaxis and therapy for neutropenic patients should be explored in future trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is intriguing that the prognostic relevance of WT1 in our study is different from that of the previous studies 11,18–20,27. Any bias in the selection of the 41 samples seems unlikely because outcome results and FAB subtype distribution in this study were very similar to the Brazilian GMTLMAI study conducted during the same period of time 30. Moreover, similar WT1 prognostic results were obtained when 54 patients (including the 41 patients of the present study) were analyzed by using a semi‐quantitative PCR method (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) were not included because transretinoic acid rendered the treatment different from the treatment of other subtypes. Our population has a high M3 frequency (approximately 25%), a common number for Latin populations 30–32. Therefore, the 41 samples are representative of approximately 30% of all non‐M3 AML patients received by our Institution during that period of time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like in оther studies, mаle sex wаs slightly predоminаnt, аnd mоst pаtients were оlder thаn 2 yeаrs (Tаble 3). 7 The mоst prevаlent mоrphоlоgicаl type wаs FАB M2 (42.9%), which wаs in clоse аgreement with previоus studies. 7,8 The FАB mоrphоlоgicаl clаssificаtiоn fоr АML cаn define treаtment аnd risk grоup strаtificаtiоn.…”
Section: Discussiоnmentioning
confidence: 80%