2020
DOI: 10.21577/0103-5053.20190258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In silico Risk Assessment Studies of New Psychoactive Substances Derived from Amphetamines and Cathinones

Abstract: The amount and variety of new psychoactive substances (NPS) are expanding, and there are difficulties in assessing their risks. In this regard, in silico methods are potentially useful to predict NPS properties faster and at a lower cost. In this work a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model was used to verify the risk of drugs derived from amphetamines and cathinones. A dataset of 26 derivatives with in vitro affinity for norepinephrine transporter (NET) was selected. To ensure reproducibil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Roy and Ambure [ 49 ], it is difficult to develop robust and predictive models from small datasets because a significant amount of information related to the dependent and independent variables can be lost due to the removal of samples to compose the test set. Therefore, in this study, an alternative approach based on studies conducted by one of the authors was adopted [ 50 – 52 ]: the dataset was randomly divided into 100 different test sets, starting from the initial model obtained (defined as the auxiliary model), with the same number of compounds for each test set (eight derivatives, 25% of the dataset). The average values and standard deviations of external validation metrics (also in Table 1 ) parameters were calculated for each test set.…”
Section: Aterial and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Roy and Ambure [ 49 ], it is difficult to develop robust and predictive models from small datasets because a significant amount of information related to the dependent and independent variables can be lost due to the removal of samples to compose the test set. Therefore, in this study, an alternative approach based on studies conducted by one of the authors was adopted [ 50 – 52 ]: the dataset was randomly divided into 100 different test sets, starting from the initial model obtained (defined as the auxiliary model), with the same number of compounds for each test set (eight derivatives, 25% of the dataset). The average values and standard deviations of external validation metrics (also in Table 1 ) parameters were calculated for each test set.…”
Section: Aterial and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LNO and Q 2 LOO must be minimal [70]. For external validation, the computationally obtained datasets were divided into submodels by applying the Kennard-Stone algorithm [71], available in Dataset Division 1.2 software (Jadavpur, Kolkata, West Bengal, India).…”
Section: Models With the Computational Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above efforts to identify and predict NPS are costand time-consuming. From a computational viewpoint, a quantitative structure-activity relationship model was used to verify the analogues of amphetamine cathinone [20]. We still need more computational tools to produce low-cost, rapid predictions of NPS and to pave the way for the earlier identification of emerging drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%