2018
DOI: 10.21577/0103-5053.20180097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, Characterization and Preliminary Study on Acetylpyrazine N(4)Butylthiosemicarbazone as a Potential CDK2 Inhibitor Combined with DFT Calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cenoic acid and cinnamic acid were optimized using Becke, 3-parameter, Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) 6-311 + +G (d,p) basis set and DFT calculations 24 . The optimized molecular structures constructed using Gauss View 5.0 are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Computational Chemistry Optimization Of Molecular Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…cenoic acid and cinnamic acid were optimized using Becke, 3-parameter, Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) 6-311 + +G (d,p) basis set and DFT calculations 24 . The optimized molecular structures constructed using Gauss View 5.0 are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Computational Chemistry Optimization Of Molecular Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ADT 4.2 software was used to calculate the binding affinity between the protein receptor and the analysed compounds. The interaction was analysed using Discovery Studio Visualizer 2016 24 .…”
Section: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Mic)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 6, the correlation coefficient ( R 2 ) of both hexadecanoic acid and 9‐octadecenoic acid is 0.9997. The high value of R 2 indicates that the experimental and theoretical results are in a good agreement (Normaya et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The GaussView 5.0 program was used to construct the optimized molecular geometry. The binding affinity between the extract compound and the protein was calculated using AutoDock software, and Discovery Studio Visualizer 2016 was used to analyze the ligand‐receptor interaction (Normaya, Ahmad, Farina, & Bulat, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEP visualization is widely used as a reactivity map displaying the electrophilic and nucleophilic attack regions and to identify the potential regions available for the interaction to occur. 21 As shown in the figure, the regions of the S1, N5 and N4 showed yellow region indicating the highest potential region for interaction with DPT-metal ion. There were also yellow regions around the phenyl rings due to the localization of electrons above and below the plane of the ring, making phenyl particularly stable.…”
Section: Molecular Electrostatic Potential (Mep)mentioning
confidence: 78%