2019
DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innominate vs. Axillary Artery Cannulation in Aortic Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis

Abstract: Objective To investigate whether axillary artery cannulation has supremacy over innominate artery cannulation in thoracic aortic surgery. Methods A comprehensive search was undertaken among the four major databases (PubMed, Excerpta Medica dataBASE [EMBASE], Scopus, and Ovid) to identify all randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials comparing axillary to innominate artery cannulation in thoracic aortic surgery. Databases were evaluated and assessed up to March 2017… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data showed no statistically significant difference in the in-hospital mortality rate at the cannulation site between RAA (6%) and IA (5.22%) ( P = 0.55). There were no significant differences between permanent and temporary nerve defects in RAA and IA cannulations [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data showed no statistically significant difference in the in-hospital mortality rate at the cannulation site between RAA (6%) and IA (5.22%) ( P = 0.55). There were no significant differences between permanent and temporary nerve defects in RAA and IA cannulations [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intraoperative procedure time supports the set-up showing similar operating time, but shorter CPB and crossclamp time for patients with axillary cannulation and open anastomosis. While in a metaanalysis of three studies prolonged CPB time during axillary perfusion has been found compared to cannulation of the innominate artery, other sources report no specific disadvantages in CPB time and axillary cannulation [ 19 , 26 ]. Our experience underlines that despite being techniqually more demanding axillary cannulation and additional hemiarch resection do not lead inevitably to longer operation and CPB times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Axillary inflow using a lateral graft reduces stroke and is a preferred method for complicated cardiac operations requiring circulatory arrest[ 57 ]. No superiority of AA cannulation over IA cannulation concerning perioperative outcomes in thoracic aortic surgery has been demonstrated[ 58 ]. In a study where they compared the early and late postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent axillary ( n = 107) and FA( n = 198) cannulation during the repair of acute Type A aortic dissection, Stamou et al [ 59 ] found that operative mortality was not affected by the cannulation site (16% for axillary cannulation vs 19% for femoral cannulation, P = 0.64) and that stroke rates were similar between the two techniques.…”
Section: Cannulation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood transfusion rates were also found to be lower compared to the AA group[ 15 ]. Harky et al [ 58 ] reported shorter CPB times (173.12 ± 51.85 min for AA cannulation and 167.45 ± 54.67 min for IA cannulation, P = 0.004) in patients who underwent AA and IA cannulation. However, they did not find a significant difference between the two patient groups in terms of mean deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) durations (29.14 ± 23.55 min for right AA cannulation and 38.48 ± 31.32 min for IA cannulation; P = 0.06).…”
Section: Cannulation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%