2020
DOI: 10.1590/s1982-21702020000200006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsurface Utility Network Cadastre Proposal, Based on Ladm (Iso / Fdis 19152)

Abstract: The increasing usage of the space above and underneath the land surface brings up the need of controlling its occupation. The localization of the infrastructure underground network is a major challenge, and for most of the countries, this information is not yet available or not easy to access. At this juncture, the cadastre of the network location is of fundamental importance for the water management supply systems. ISO 19152 from 2012 -Land Administration Domain Model (LADM) -addresses the standardization and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LADM is a leading international 3D data model in the land administration domain. In recent years, several studies have worked on developing LADM-based country profiles for underground areas (Dželalija & Roić, 2022;Janečka & Bobíková, 2018;Kim & Heo, 2017;Radulović et al, 2019;Ramlakhan et al, 2023;Saeidian et al, 2022;Silva & Carneiro, 2020;Yan et al, 2019Yan et al, , 2021. However, these studies mostly focused on the legal spaces attached to underground assets.…”
Section: Current S Tandards For Modelling Underg Round S U Rv E Y Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LADM is a leading international 3D data model in the land administration domain. In recent years, several studies have worked on developing LADM-based country profiles for underground areas (Dželalija & Roić, 2022;Janečka & Bobíková, 2018;Kim & Heo, 2017;Radulović et al, 2019;Ramlakhan et al, 2023;Saeidian et al, 2022;Silva & Carneiro, 2020;Yan et al, 2019Yan et al, , 2021. However, these studies mostly focused on the legal spaces attached to underground assets.…”
Section: Current S Tandards For Modelling Underg Round S U Rv E Y Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies are limited to asset types such as utility networks (Radulović et al, 2018;Radulović et al, 2019;Silva and Carneiro, 2020;Yan et al, 2019a;Yan et al, 2019b;Yan et al, 2019c;Yan et al, 2021), underground buildings (Kim and Heo, 2017), and wine cellar (Janečka and Bobíková, 2018). These studies were conducted based on the requirements in different jurisdictions such as Singapore (Yan et al, 2019a;Yan et al, 2019b;Yan et al, 2019c;Yan et al, 2021), Korea (Kim and Heo, 2017), Czech Republic (Janečka and Bobíková, 2018), Brazil (Silva and Carneiro, 2020), and Serbia (Radulović et al, 2018;Radulović et al, 2019). On the other side, most of these studies used the LADM data model, which is a conceptual legal data model.…”
Section: Underground Land Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prominent legal 3D model adopted for land administration is the Land Administration Domain Model (LADM) [67]. Some studies have adopted LADM for managing underground land information [16,17,20,52,62,68,69]; however, LADM is limited to modelling the ownership space of different underground assets such as utility networks. The primary issue with LADM is its inefficient communication of ownership boundaries referencing physical location of underground assets.…”
Section: Technical Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%