2018
DOI: 10.1590/s1982-21702018000400027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Clustering Performance of Affinity Propagation Algorithm Considering the Influence of Preference Parameter and Damping Factor

Abstract: The identification of significant underlying data patterns such as image composition and spatial arrangements is fundamental in remote sensing tasks. Therefore, the development of an effective approach for information extraction is crucial to achieve this goal. Affinity propagation (AP) algorithm is a novel powerful technique with the ability of handling with unusual data, containing both categorical and numerical attributes. However, AP has some limitations related to the choice of initial preference paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of clusters can be generated according to what a user specifies by adding one constraint in the message passing process to restrict the number of clusters to K [15]. While the AP is a parameter set by its users, another advantage of this method is the belief in an object to serve as an example which is automatically adapted by k-affinity propagation [10], [18].…”
Section: K-affinity Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of clusters can be generated according to what a user specifies by adding one constraint in the message passing process to restrict the number of clusters to K [15]. While the AP is a parameter set by its users, another advantage of this method is the belief in an object to serve as an example which is automatically adapted by k-affinity propagation [10], [18].…”
Section: K-affinity Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K-AP produces K clusters based on predetermined needs and parameters in terms of determining rules or controls in the message delivery process. Another advantage of this method is the belief in an object to serve as an exemplar which is automatically adapted by K-AP, while the AP is a parameter set by its users [20]. Besides, the overhead (memory usage during processing) computation of K-AP is insignificant compared to the AP.…”
Section: K-affinity Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the preference value must be swept to achieve optimal clustering performance. However, this approach inevitably entails an extremely high computational complexity, as shown in [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%