2021
DOI: 10.1590/pboci.2021.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Analysis of Root Canal Treatments performed by Undergraduate Students: A Retrospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our investigation, the results indicated that female students had 73% acceptable obturation, while males had 63.1%. These values in our study were higher than those in another study reported by Agwan et al [ 40 ], which found that females had a 57% adequate obturation length, while in males, that value was 62%. In another previous study in Saudi Arabia, Alosaimi et al [ 29 ] reported that the technical quality of root canal fillings performed by female students was 51.9% compared to 48.1% for male students.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…In our investigation, the results indicated that female students had 73% acceptable obturation, while males had 63.1%. These values in our study were higher than those in another study reported by Agwan et al [ 40 ], which found that females had a 57% adequate obturation length, while in males, that value was 62%. In another previous study in Saudi Arabia, Alosaimi et al [ 29 ] reported that the technical quality of root canal fillings performed by female students was 51.9% compared to 48.1% for male students.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…A total of 114, 18, 8, and 53 published articles were excluded. Finally, 16 published papers were selected for full-text retrieval in the present systematic review study [9][10][11][12][13][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. These studies measured the quality of RCFs and the overall quality treatments made by different treatment practicing settings (private, academic, and hospital) for different teeth types (anterior, premolar, and molar).…”
Section: Literature Search and Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 and Table 1 present the characteristics of the 16 clinical studies included: 10 were conducted in 2023 [9][10][11]22,23] and 2021 [13,[26][27][28]30], 4 were published in 2022 [12,24,25,29], and a recent study was published in 2024 [32]. In relation to the study country, 8 studies were assessed in Saudi Arabia and Gulf countries [6,10,11,22,23,31], followed by 3, 2, 2, and 1 study documented in Brazil, Türkiye, Europe, and South Africa, respectively [9,12,13,22,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations