2022
DOI: 10.1590/fst.40120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of protein powder from the liver of Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacores): a comparison of acid- and alkali-aided pH-shifting

Abstract: For the high-value utilization of tuna liver, the effects of acid-aided (Acid-pH) and alkali-aided pH-shifting (Alkali-pH) on the physicochemical and functional properties of the protein powder prepared by pH-shifting and freeze-drying were studied. As expected, the protein powder with high purity could be obtained through Acid-pH or Alkali-pH followed by freeze drying, while the Alkali-pH led to a higher protein yield, higher protein ratio, lower lipid ratio and lower heavy metal content than Acid-pH. The ami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, due to intense heat and pressure, this process diminishes the product's functionality (Petrova et al, 2018;Zamora-Sillero et al, 2018). On the other hand, alkali hydrolysis uses calcium, sodium, or potassium hydroxide as alkaline agents to divide (Melgosa et al, 2020;Petrova et al, 2018;Shen et al, 2021;Surasani, 2018) Mackerel whole body Recovered protein 49.48% with HCl 0.1 M (Álvarez et al, 2018) Baltic herring whole body Protein yield 30.0% at pH 2.5 (Nisov et al, 2022) Cod (head, tail, bones) (Álvarez et al, 2018;Melgosa et al, 2020;Petrova et al, 2018;Shen et al, 2021;Surasani, 2018;Villamil et al, 2017;Zamora-Sillero et al, 2018) Mackerel DH 12.6% (Nikoo et al, 2021a) Enzymatic hydrolysis: Bui et al, 2021;Mongkonkamthorn et al, 2020;Saidi et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019b) • High specificity (Ghorbel-Bellaaj et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2019;Mechri et al, 2020;Nugroho et al, 2020;Rajendran et al, 2018) • Bacterial growth Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences protein molecules. In contrast to acidic hydrolysis, alkali hydrolysis requires a less extreme working environment, for instance 54℃ (Melgosa et al, 2020;Petrova et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methods In Bioactive Peptide Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, due to intense heat and pressure, this process diminishes the product's functionality (Petrova et al, 2018;Zamora-Sillero et al, 2018). On the other hand, alkali hydrolysis uses calcium, sodium, or potassium hydroxide as alkaline agents to divide (Melgosa et al, 2020;Petrova et al, 2018;Shen et al, 2021;Surasani, 2018) Mackerel whole body Recovered protein 49.48% with HCl 0.1 M (Álvarez et al, 2018) Baltic herring whole body Protein yield 30.0% at pH 2.5 (Nisov et al, 2022) Cod (head, tail, bones) (Álvarez et al, 2018;Melgosa et al, 2020;Petrova et al, 2018;Shen et al, 2021;Surasani, 2018;Villamil et al, 2017;Zamora-Sillero et al, 2018) Mackerel DH 12.6% (Nikoo et al, 2021a) Enzymatic hydrolysis: Bui et al, 2021;Mongkonkamthorn et al, 2020;Saidi et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019b) • High specificity (Ghorbel-Bellaaj et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2019;Mechri et al, 2020;Nugroho et al, 2020;Rajendran et al, 2018) • Bacterial growth Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences protein molecules. In contrast to acidic hydrolysis, alkali hydrolysis requires a less extreme working environment, for instance 54℃ (Melgosa et al, 2020;Petrova et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methods In Bioactive Peptide Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amino acids of TPP protein and pH‐shift protein were analyzed following the method of Shen et al. (2021) with some modifications. First, the sample was subjected to acidic hydrolysis (mixed with 6 mol/L HCl, 110°C and 18 hr).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the mainstream view is that the aforementioned differences are due to the diverse denaturation degrees of protein which can result from different preparation methods. Regarding various raw materials, protein with better functional properties can typically be obtained by Alkali‐pH than by Acid‐pH, and the relevant scholars have all attributed this to the more serious denaturation degree of protein in acidic conditions (Surasani, 2018; Shen et al., 2022; Tang et al., 2021). Furthermore, the extreme pHs used in pH‐shift result in a reduction in the functional properties of protein obtained, which has also mainly been explained by the more severe degree of denaturation under extreme conditions (Abdollahi & Undeland, 2019; Cha et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%