Necessity of Log(1/R) and Kubelka-Munk transformation in chemometrics analysis to predict white rice flour adulteration in brown rice flour using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy

Abstract

This study compared the calibration model performance of reflectance to absorbance transformation spectra combined with pre-processing spectra to find the best model to predict white rice flour adulteration in brown rice flour using the visible and near-infrared spectrometer. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) and principal component regression (PCR) were compared using reflectance, Kubelka-Munk (KM), and Log(1/R) spectra. Area normalization (AN) and Savitsky-smoothing Golay's (SGS) were pre-processing methods. The sample was white rice flour mixed with brown rice flour at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%. Reflectance spectra outperformed KM and log (1/R) spectra in this study. Reflectance spectra provided the best model for PLSR and PCR. Pre-processed SGS spectra were best for PLSR, while raw reflectance spectra were best for PCR. PLSR and PCR both had an R 2 of prediction of 0.96, while the overall average R 2 of prediction favors PLSR over PCR. The present study led to the discovery of a simple novel method for developing adulteration flour and showed that a visible near-infrared spectrometer combined with PLSR, or PCR, could predict white rice flour adulteration in brown rice flour.