2016
DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brazilian guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of primary cutaneous melanoma - Part II

Abstract: The last Brazilian guidelines on melanoma were published in 2002. Development in diagnosis and treatment made updating necessary. The coordinators elaborated ten clinical questions, based on PICO system. A Medline search, according to specific MeSH terms for each of the 10 questions was performed and articles selected were classified from A to D according to level of scientific evidence. Based on the results, recommendations were defined and classified according to scientific strength. The present Guidelines w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty-one records were included in the full-text review after title and abstract screening and removal of duplicates. Of these guidelines, four were dismissed, as they had already expired at the time of our search [9][10][11][12], one was in development [13] and another one was only available as a presentation [14]. Furthermore, we identified four more duplicates [15][16][17][18] and two records were excluded due to unclear methodological approaches [19,20].…”
Section: Guideline Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-one records were included in the full-text review after title and abstract screening and removal of duplicates. Of these guidelines, four were dismissed, as they had already expired at the time of our search [9][10][11][12], one was in development [13] and another one was only available as a presentation [14]. Furthermore, we identified four more duplicates [15][16][17][18] and two records were excluded due to unclear methodological approaches [19,20].…”
Section: Guideline Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A presença de mitose e regressão seria decisiva para indicar BLNS em algum momento e hoje não o é mais. 25 No presente estudo, diferentes motivos justificaram o BLNS para pacientes com Breslow <0,8 mm: regressão foi identificada em 5 casos, 1 lesão acral, 1 lesão com satelitose, 2 de taxa mitótica >1, uma biópsia por raspagem incompleta, onde a espessura de Breslow foi determinada como "pelo menos", 2 casos em que o paciente exigiu a cirurgia por vontade própria.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…29 As taxas de complicações de MC relatadas após a BLNS são altamente variáveis na literatura, ficando entre 1,8% e 29,9%. [30][31][32] Em uma revisão sistemática da literatura, Moody et al 25 encontraram uma taxa geral de complicações de 11,3% entre os pacientes submetidos à BLNS, a maioria temporária. A incidência de infecção foi de 2,9%; seroma, 5,1%; hematoma, 0,5%; linfedema, 1,3%; e lesão do nervo, 0,3%.…”
Section: Cadeias De Drenagemunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Samples were obtained in the period between 1996 and 2010 and reviewed by an experienced melanoma pathologist (G.L.). Histopathological prognostic factors were established according to the WHO protocol and guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Pathology (Castro et al, , ; LeBoit, Burg, Weedon, & Sarasain, ). The study was approved by the ethics review board of the Federal University of Sao Paulo (CEP #1013/11), Brazil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%